Really good vs. Really bad.
Published Sunday, July 30, 2006 by Sherwoods | E-mail this post
So in as little as one minute I saw some of the worst advertising to some of the best of the year: at least in my opinion. Let's explore.
Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby doesn't look to be a blockbuster, though Will Farrell does have his fair share of fans. However, the movie and the critique thereof
is not the focus of this post. The intelligent marketing and cross-promotion, however, is. Sprint-Nextel has launched a new campaign that includes shots of "Ricky Bobby" in different parts of his house using his Sprint-Nextel phone. Wait a minute... doesn't Nextel sponsor Nascar? Oh, I think it does. So the mixing of "genres," if you will, works rather well. Sports, Telecommunications, and Box Office work pretty well together. At least in this example. Sprint seems to have lost its cloaked stranger for a comedian. Will it pay off? Will Will help the business-oriented, convenience-factor-laden company gain a new market segment in the Nascar lover? It remains to be seen.
On the other hand, and in the other half minute I choked down cable TV today, I saw what I would nominate as the absolute poorest advertisement of the year. The entire campaign makes me sick and the mixing of these two genres is like a bad Bertie Bott's Every Flavor Jelly Bean. Mercedes Benz' new campaign involves Americana-type music **enter jukebox** and something or another about the
American dream. Wait another minute... when did Mercedes become American? Daimler-Chrysler, sure. But, they still have Jeep, Dodge, Chrysler to p
ull the American card with. I mean, you could even launch the 4-wheel drive car/truck AMC Eagle again. But, why in the name of all that is holy would Mercedes claim to be part of the American dream complete with American Rock n' Roll? Somebody, please help me understand this.
0 Responses to “Really good vs. Really bad.”
Leave a Reply